Turn everything on your plate into a realistic week plan with clear priorities and a cut-list of what will not fit.
What it does
Monday morning, everything is a priority, and by Wednesday the plan is already fiction. The problem is usually not discipline. It is that the week was planned against the hours you wish you had.
With this skill active, the assistant does the arithmetic first. It takes out your meetings, then the messages and interruptions your job really carries, then keeps about 70% of what is left. That number is usually far smaller than expected, and it decides everything else: three priorities at most, work placed where your energy actually is, and one protected block that nothing may take.
Whatever does not fit goes on a cut-list with a destination - next week, delegated to a named person, declined, or genuinely dropped. If the must-do work alone exceeds the hours, it says so plainly and helps you draft the message, because that is a conversation rather than a scheduling puzzle.
You end up with a day-by-day plan built on your real hours, plus a cut-list saying exactly what is not happening and where it went.
When to reach for it
Use it at the start of a week, when the list has outgrown the days, or mid-week when the plan has already broken and you need to re-cut what is left.
Less useful if your week is genuinely reactive - support, operations, on-call - where it will plan one or two real items and be honest that the rest belongs to whatever arrives. And it plans time; it will not decide between two things that both have to happen, which is a different conversation.
---
name: week-planner
description: Turns a brain-dump of everything on someone's plate into a week plan that fits the hours they actually have, with a forced ranking, work placed against real energy and fixed commitments, and an explicit cut-list of what is not happening and where it went. Use at the start of a week, or mid-week when the plan has already broken.
---
# Week Planner
You are the person who does the arithmetic nobody wants to do. A week plan is not a list of intentions, it is a claim about time, and most claims about time are wrong by a factor of two.
## The arithmetic comes first
Capacity before priorities. If you sort the list before you know the hours, you produce a beautifully ordered plan that does not fit, and by Wednesday it is abandoned.
Work out the real number of focused hours available, then decide what gets them.
## Workflow
1. **Collect everything.** A full brain-dump, messy, including personal items and the thing they have been avoiding. Nothing stays in their head.
2. **Block the fixed commitments first.** Meetings, appointments, school runs, travel, the standing call. These are not negotiable and they are not planning; they are the shape of the week.
3. **Calculate real capacity.** Hours in the week, minus fixed commitments, minus the reactive load their job actually carries, then take about 70% of what is left. That number is the budget.
4. **Force the ranking.** Must this week, should this week, would be nice. Cap the musts at three outcomes.
5. **Estimate honestly**, then add a buffer. Most people underestimate by roughly half.
6. **Compare the total to the budget.** If it overflows, it overflows. Say so before assigning anything to a day.
7. **Assign to days**, matching hard work to good energy, protecting one real block of focus time, and batching the small similar things together.
8. **Write the cut-list.** Everything that did not fit, each with a destination: next week, delegated, declined, or dropped.
9. **Name the flexible item per day** - the one thing to move first when the day goes wrong, because it will.
Copy this checklist into your working notes and tick it as you go:
```text
Week plan checklist
[ ] Full brain-dump captured, personal items included
[ ] Fixed commitments blocked before any planning
[ ] Real capacity calculated: hours minus fixed minus reactive, times 0.7
[ ] Musts capped at three outcomes
[ ] Honest estimates with a buffer added
[ ] Total compared to capacity, overflow stated out loud
[ ] Hardest work placed at best energy
[ ] One protected focus block that nothing may take
[ ] Small similar tasks batched
[ ] Cut-list written, every item with a destination
[ ] Flexible item named for each day
[ ] Friday left partly open
```
## Calculating real capacity
Ask for the week's hours, then subtract honestly:
- **Fixed commitments.** Everything already in the calendar, plus the travel around it.
- **Reactive load.** The email, messages, questions and interruptions their role actually carries. For most people this is one to three hours a day, and pretending otherwise is why plans fail.
- **The 70% rule.** Take 70% of what remains. The other 30% absorbs the things that go wrong, which are not exceptional; they are the normal texture of a week.
Say the number out loud: "You have about fourteen focused hours this week." It is usually much lower than expected, and it is the single most useful sentence in the plan.
## Forcing the ranking
Three musts. Not five, not "these eight are all critical".
Ask one question about each candidate: what actually happens if this does not happen this week? Real consequences promote an item. "It would be good to have it done" does not.
Then check the three musts fit inside the budget with room left. If the musts alone exceed capacity, stop planning. That is not a scheduling problem and no arrangement of days will fix it. Say so, and give two options: something moves, or someone else takes it. See the edge cases.
## Placing work in the week
- **Hard work at good energy.** Ask when they think best. Most people have a two to three hour window and spend it on email.
- **One protected block.** At least ninety minutes, on the most important thing, defended. A week with no protected block will produce no meaningful work regardless of how neat the list is.
- **Batch the small things.** All the short admin in one sitting rather than scattered through the week. Scattered small tasks consume the gaps that real work needs.
- **Do not schedule the day after a heavy day heavily.** Recovery is real and unplanned recovery gets taken anyway, usually from the wrong thing.
- **Leave Friday afternoon loose.** For overflow, for the thing that appeared on Tuesday, and for looking at next week.
## The cut-list
The cut-list is the most valuable part of the plan, and the part people resist. A task that "might get done if there is time" will not get done, and pretending otherwise costs the week its honesty.
Every cut item gets a destination:
- **Next week** - and it goes on next week's list now, not in their memory.
- **Delegated** - to a named person, with what "done" means.
- **Declined** - and it needs a message, which is worth drafting while the reasoning is fresh.
- **Dropped** - genuinely not happening. Say it plainly. Some items have been carried for months and deserve a proper burial.
## Output shape
- **This week's focus** - one to three outcomes, one line.
- **Your real capacity** - the number, and how it was reached.
- **The plan** - by day, with times, fixed commitments shown alongside the work.
- **If a day slips** - the flexible item for each day.
- **Cut-list** - what is not happening, each with a destination.
- **Reality check** - one honest line on whether this fits.
## Example
**Input from the user**
> Fourteen things on my list, three meetings, and I think about twenty hours of actual work time. I run marketing for a small company. The big ones are the campaign launch on Thursday, the quarterly report for the board, hiring for the open role, and the website copy that has been waiting a month.
**Your real capacity:** you said twenty hours. Three meetings and their surrounding travel take about four. Your role carries roughly ninety minutes a day of reactive work, which is another seven or so. That leaves nine, and at 70% the honest budget is **about six and a half focused hours**. That is the number this plan is built on, and it is why most of your fourteen items are not in it.
**This week's focus:** launch the campaign Thursday, and get the board report to a reviewable draft.
**The plan**
- **Monday** - Campaign assets final check (90 min, morning, your best block). Batch of small admin: invoices, two approvals, expenses (45 min, after lunch). *Flexible: the admin batch.*
- **Tuesday** - Board report: pull the numbers and write the first draft (2 hours, morning, protected). Team meeting (60 min). *Flexible: nothing. This is the protected block.*
- **Wednesday** - Campaign final checks and schedule everything (60 min). Two hiring calls (90 min). *Flexible: move one hiring call to Friday if the campaign wobbles.*
- **Thursday** - Launch morning: watch it, fix what breaks, hold the space (no other work before 1pm). Board report second pass (60 min, afternoon). *Flexible: the second pass.*
- **Friday** - Send the board report (30 min). Loose afternoon for whatever Thursday produced, and next week's plan.
**If a day slips:** the admin batch on Monday and the board report's second pass on Thursday are the two movable things. Do not move Tuesday morning; everything else in the week assumes that draft exists.
**Cut-list**
- **Website copy** - next week, first slot Monday. It has waited a month; it can wait five days, but it goes on next week's list now, not back on the mental pile.
- **Competitor research** - dropped. It has been on the list for six weeks, which is the list telling you something.
- **Newsletter for this month** - delegated to Sam, with the campaign copy as the source material. Tell Sam today, not Thursday.
- **Conference speaking application** - declined. The deadline is Friday and there is no version of this week where it gets the attention it needs. Worth a two-line reply so it is properly closed.
**Reality check:** this fits, but only because four things came off. If the launch goes badly on Thursday, the board report's second pass is the casualty, and Friday morning absorbs it.
Notice what the capacity arithmetic did: the user offered twenty hours, the honest figure was closer to six and a half, and that difference is the whole reason the plan works.
## Rules
- Do the capacity arithmetic before any sorting.
- Plan to about 70% of what is left. The rest is not spare, it is already spoken for.
- Three musts, maximum. A week where everything is a priority has none.
- Every cut item gets a named destination.
- Protect one real focus block and say what it is for.
- Match the hardest work to their best hours, not to the first free slot.
- Batch small tasks together instead of scattering them.
- If it does not fit, the answer is a shorter list, not a longer day.
- Leave Friday afternoon partly open.
## Edge cases
- **The musts alone exceed capacity.** Stop planning and say so directly. This is a conversation with a manager or a client, not a scheduling puzzle. Offer the two real options - move a deadline, or move the work to someone else - and offer to draft the message.
- **Their week is nearly all meetings.** Show the arithmetic: if fixed commitments take thirty hours, there are perhaps three focused hours left, and only one thing can happen. That is a finding worth showing to whoever books their diary.
- **Mid-week rescue.** Do not rebuild the whole plan. Take what is left of the week, recalculate the remaining capacity, and re-cut. Two days is a different problem from five.
- **Everything is reactive** - support, operations, on-call. Plan the one or two proactive items and be explicit that the rest of the week belongs to whatever arrives. A plan that ignores this is a plan that fails on Monday morning.
- **They keep carrying the same item for weeks.** Name it. Ask whether it is a decision they are avoiding, work that belongs to someone else, or something that should simply be dropped.
- **The estimates are obviously optimistic.** Say so once, with the evidence: "you estimated three hours for something similar last month and it took seven". Then use the honest number.
- **Personal items in the list.** Keep them in the plan. They consume the same hours as work does, and a plan that pretends otherwise overstates capacity by exactly their size.
- **They ask for a plan when they need a decision.** If two of the musts are mutually exclusive, no arrangement of days will solve it. Point at the conflict and stop.
## Files
- `references/examples.md` - three weeks planned end to end: an overloaded individual contributor, an owner with a hard external deadline, and a week that genuinely does not fit, showing what the escalation output looks like. Read it to see how the capacity arithmetic drives everything else.
- `references/template.md` - the capacity worksheet, brain-dump prompts, a blank week grid, cut-list wording for telling people something moved, and a five-minute Friday review. Read it before running a planning session.
references/examples.md
# Worked weeks
Three planning sessions. In each one the capacity arithmetic is done before anything is sorted, and in each one it changes the answer.
## Contents
- [Example 1: an overloaded week that fits after cutting](#example-1-an-overloaded-week-that-fits-after-cutting)
- [Example 2: a hard external deadline](#example-2-a-hard-external-deadline)
- [Example 3: a week that does not fit](#example-3-a-week-that-does-not-fit)
- [What the three have in common](#what-the-three-have-in-common)
---
## Example 1: an overloaded week that fits after cutting
### The brain-dump
> Finish the client report. Prep for Thursday's review. Two candidate interviews. Reply to the partnership email from last week. Update the team wiki. Book the dentist. Expenses. Look at the new analytics tool. Write the case study. One-to-ones with three people. Fix the broken onboarding email. Sort out my mother's insurance renewal.
>
> Fixed: team meeting Monday 10-11, review Thursday 2-4, one-to-ones I can place anywhere. About 35 working hours.
### Capacity
> 35 hours in the week. Fixed commitments take 3. Your role carries about 2 hours a day of messages and questions, so 10. That leaves 22, and at 70% your honest budget is **about 15 focused hours**. Three one-to-ones will take another 90 minutes plus the thinking around them, so call it **13 and a half**.
### Ranking
**Must:** the client report (deadline), Thursday's review prep (fixed date, and going in unprepared wastes four people's afternoon), the two interviews (candidates are waiting and good ones leave).
**Should:** the partnership reply, the broken onboarding email, the one-to-ones.
**Nice:** wiki, case study, analytics tool.
**Personal:** dentist, insurance renewal. These are staying in the plan. They take real time and hiding them is how the plan overstates itself.
### The plan
- **Monday** - Team meeting (10-11). Client report, first half (2 hours, 11-1, your best block). Expenses and dentist booking (30 min, batched after lunch). *Flexible: the batch.*
- **Tuesday** - Client report, finish and send (2 hours, morning, protected). Interview one (60 min). One-to-one, Dee (30 min). *Flexible: the one-to-one.*
- **Wednesday** - Review prep (2 hours, morning). Interview two (60 min). Two one-to-ones (60 min). *Flexible: move one one-to-one to Friday.*
- **Thursday** - Review prep final pass (45 min, morning). Review (2-4). Partnership reply (30 min, after the review, while you are still in that mode). *Flexible: the partnership reply.*
- **Friday** - Fix the broken onboarding email (90 min). Mother's insurance renewal (45 min). Loose afternoon. *Flexible: everything; this is the absorption day.*
**Cut-list**
- **Team wiki** - next week, and it goes on next week's list now.
- **Case study** - next week, provisionally. It has moved twice, so if it moves again it is not really a must and should be dropped or given to someone else.
- **New analytics tool** - dropped. Nothing depends on it and it is curiosity, which is fine but does not get 13 hours' worth of week.
**Reality check:** this fits with roughly two hours of slack, which is right rather than generous. If the client report runs long, Friday absorbs it.
**Why it is shaped this way:** the personal items stay in the plan and consume 75 minutes, which is exactly the kind of time that makes plans fail when it is left out. The case study is flagged as having moved twice, which is a signal about the item rather than about the week.
---
## Example 2: a hard external deadline
### The brain-dump
> Tender response due Friday 5pm, non-negotiable. Also: two client deliveries mid-week, payroll on Wednesday, a supplier meeting I could move, and about ten small things.
>
> I run a six-person agency. Fixed: payroll Wednesday morning, client calls Tuesday and Thursday. Maybe 40 hours but I am also the person everything comes to.
### Capacity
> 40 hours. Fixed commitments take 5. As the person everything routes through, your reactive load is nearer 3 hours a day, so 15. That leaves 20, and at 70% the budget is **about 14 focused hours**.
>
> The tender alone needs 8 to 10 if it is going to be good. That is two thirds of your week for one document, and everything below is built around that fact.
### The plan
- **Monday** - Tender: outline and the sections only you can write (3 hours, morning, protected, door closed). Delegate the two client deliveries to Kwame and Ana with clear briefs (45 min). *Flexible: nothing before 1pm.*
- **Tuesday** - Tender: the main response (3 hours, morning, protected). Client call (60 min). *Flexible: nothing in the morning.*
- **Wednesday** - Payroll (60 min, and it cannot move). Tender: pricing and the commercial section (2 hours). *Flexible: the small things, all of them.*
- **Thursday** - Tender: full read-through and fixes (2 hours). Client call (60 min). Send the tender to Dee for a cold read by 4pm. *Flexible: nothing.*
- **Friday** - Act on Dee's comments (90 min). Submit by 2pm, not 5pm. Loose afternoon. *Flexible: everything after submission.*
**Cut-list**
- **Supplier meeting** - moved to next week. It is the one movable fixed commitment, and moving it buys back 90 minutes in the week where you have least.
- **The ten small things** - Wednesday afternoon in one batch, and whatever does not fit goes to next week. None of them has a consequence this week.
- **Client deliveries** - delegated to Kwame and Ana Monday morning, not Wednesday. Brief them while you have time to answer questions.
**Reality check:** this fits, and it has almost no slack. The submission is planned for 2pm on Friday rather than 5pm, because a deadline used to the last minute has no room for a failed upload or a missing signature.
**Why it is shaped this way:** submitting three hours before the deadline is the buffer, and it is deliberate rather than cautious. The delegation happens Monday, when there is capacity to brief properly, instead of Wednesday, when a rushed brief would produce work that needs redoing.
---
## Example 3: a week that does not fit
### The brain-dump
> Quarterly board pack. Two customer escalations. Performance reviews for five people, due Friday. A product launch on Thursday I am presenting at. Plus the usual.
>
> Fixed: 12 hours of meetings. About 45 working hours if I am honest, and I do not want to work the weekend again.
### The arithmetic, and the stop
> 45 hours. Fixed meetings take 12. Your reactive load at this level is 3 hours a day, so 15. That leaves 18, and at 70% the honest budget is **about 12 focused hours**.
>
> Now the musts:
>
> - Board pack: 6 to 8 hours if it is not to be embarrassing.
> - Five performance reviews: 5 hours minimum, and rushing them is worse than being late with them.
> - Launch presentation: 3 hours of preparation.
> - Two customer escalations: unknown, but escalations are never under 2 hours each.
>
> That is 18 to 20 hours of must against a 12-hour budget. **This week does not fit, and no arrangement of days will make it fit.** Cutting the nice-to-haves does not help, because they are not what is overflowing.
### What to do instead
This is a conversation, not a plan. Three options, in order of what they actually cost:
1. **Move the performance reviews.** They are internal, they are the largest single block, and a week's delay with a clear explanation costs less than five rushed reviews. This is the recommendation.
2. **Hand the board pack's data sections to someone else** and write only the narrative yourself. Saves perhaps 3 hours, and needs someone available today rather than Wednesday.
3. **Hand one escalation to a deputy** with a proper brief and a promise to step in if it worsens.
Any two of these bring the week inside its budget. Taking option one alone brings the must-work to about 13 hours, which still needs a small cut but is a week rather than a crisis.
### The message to send, if option one is chosen
> The performance reviews are due Friday. With the board pack, Thursday's launch and two live escalations, I can either deliver five rushed reviews on Friday or five proper ones by the following Wednesday. I would rather do them properly - tell me if the Friday date is fixed for a reason I am not seeing.
**Then, once something has moved,** the plan can be built.
**Why it is shaped this way:** the arithmetic is shown before the conclusion, so the "it does not fit" verdict is a result rather than an opinion. The options are ordered by cost and one is recommended outright. The draft message exists because the hardest part of this scenario is not knowing what to cut, it is telling someone.
---
## What the three have in common
- The capacity number is calculated and stated out loud before anything is sorted, and in all three it is far below the hours the user offered.
- Personal items are kept in the plan, because they take the same hours as work.
- Every day names its flexible item, and days with protected blocks name that nothing is flexible before lunch.
- The cut-list gives each item a destination, and items that have moved more than once are flagged as a signal rather than silently moved again.
- When the week genuinely does not fit, the output is an escalation with a draft message, not a cleverer schedule.
references/template.md
# Worksheets and templates
Copy the capacity worksheet, then the week grid. The prompts exist because a brain-dump is only as good as the questions that empty the head.
## Contents
- [Capacity worksheet](#capacity-worksheet)
- [Brain-dump prompts](#brain-dump-prompts)
- [The ranking question](#the-ranking-question)
- [Week grid](#week-grid)
- [Estimating honestly](#estimating-honestly)
- [Cut-list wording](#cut-list-wording)
- [The five-minute Friday review](#the-five-minute-friday-review)
---
## Capacity worksheet
```text
Working hours available this week _____ h
Minus fixed commitments (meetings + travel) - ____ h
Minus reactive load (____ h/day x ____ days) - ____ h
------
Remaining = ____ h
x 0.7 = ____ h <- the budget
Must-do work, estimated with buffer = ____ h
Fits? (budget minus must-do) = ____ h
```
If the last line is negative, stop planning and read the escalation section of the SKILL.md edge cases. No arrangement of days fixes a negative number.
Typical reactive load, as a starting point to adjust:
| Role shape | Reactive hours per day |
|---|---|
| Focused individual work, few dependencies | 1 |
| Individual contributor with clients or stakeholders | 1.5 to 2 |
| Team lead or manager | 2 to 3 |
| Owner, or the person everything routes through | 3+ |
| Support, operations, on-call | Most of the day; plan only one or two proactive items |
## Brain-dump prompts
Ask these until the answers stop. A list built from memory alone is always missing the same things.
- What is due this week with a real date attached?
- What did you promise someone that they are expecting?
- What has moved from last week's plan?
- What are you avoiding? Name it even if it stays on the cut-list.
- What is waiting on you that someone else cannot start without?
- What personal thing will take work hours - an appointment, a call, a form, a family obligation?
- What arrives every week that you never write down but always do?
- What would ruin next week if it did not happen this week?
That last question is the one that most often promotes something into the musts.
## The ranking question
For every candidate must, ask: **what actually happens if this does not happen this week?**
| Answer | Verdict |
|---|---|
| A deadline is missed with a consequence | Must |
| Someone else is blocked | Must |
| A person is left waiting on something they need to decide | Must |
| It gets harder or more expensive later | Should |
| It would be good to have done | Nice |
| Nothing | Cut |
Three musts maximum. If four survive, ask which one the user would sacrifice if they were ill on Wednesday. That answer is the real ranking.
## Week grid
```text
WEEK OF ____________ FOCUS: ____________________________
CAPACITY: ____ focused hours
MON Fixed: ______________________
Work: ______________________ (__ min) [best-energy block]
Work: ______________________ (__ min)
Flexible today: _____________
TUE Fixed: ______________________
Work: ______________________ (__ min) [PROTECTED - nothing takes this]
Flexible today: _____________
WED Fixed: ______________________
Work: ______________________ (__ min)
Flexible today: _____________
THU Fixed: ______________________
Work: ______________________ (__ min)
Flexible today: _____________
FRI Work: ______________________ (__ min)
Afternoon: loose - overflow, and next week's plan
CUT-LIST
- ______________ -> next week / delegated to ____ / declined / dropped
- ______________ -> next week / delegated to ____ / declined / dropped
REALITY CHECK: ____________________________________________
```
## Estimating honestly
- Ask what a similar task took last time. Use that number, not the hopeful one.
- Add 50% to anything involving another person's response.
- Add 50% to anything the user has never done before.
- Anything estimated at "half a day" is a day. Anything estimated at "an hour" that involves opening a document is ninety minutes.
- Estimate the whole task including the finishing: the send, the file, the follow-up message. Those are where the missing time hides.
- If the user resists a larger estimate, use theirs and note the risk in the reality check rather than arguing. The plan will teach the lesson by Wednesday.
## Cut-list wording
Cutting is easy privately and hard out loud. Ready lines for the second part:
- **Moving it to next week:** "I am not going to get to this properly this week. It is first on my list Monday and you will have it by [day]."
- **Delegating:** "Sam is picking this up. He has what he needs, and [day] is the date. Come to me if anything is unclear."
- **Declining:** "I cannot take this on this week without dropping [thing], and that has a fixed date. If it can wait until [date] I can do it properly."
- **Dropping for good:** "This has been on my list for six weeks without moving, which tells me it is not going to happen. I am taking it off rather than carrying it. Say so if that is wrong."
The last one is worth sending. Items carried silently for months cost more attention than the message ever would.
## The five-minute Friday review
Do this before planning next week. It takes five minutes and it makes the next plan noticeably better.
1. What actually got done? Compare against the plan, without excuses or explanations.
2. Which estimate was most wrong, and by how much? Adjust the next one.
3. What did the reactive load actually consume? If it was higher than budgeted, lower next week's capacity rather than trying harder.
4. What is still on the cut-list from last week? Anything that has survived three cuts is not a task, it is a decision.
5. What is the one thing next week must produce?
Install it
Claude Code (this project)
Unzip the download into .claude/skills/. The folder is already named right.
Claude Code (every project)
Unzip into ~/.claude/skills/ to use it everywhere.
claude.ai
Upload the zip under Settings, then Capabilities, then Skills (paid plans).
How to call it
Just describe the task. The description line inside the skill does the matching. Or call it directly:
/week-plannerhelp me plan my weekI have too much on and no idea what to dropwhat should I actually focus on this weekmy week is already falling apart, help me re-plandoes all of this even fit in the time I have
Works beyond Claude
Skills use the open Agent Skills format. The exact same folder works in OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and other tools that read the format.
Using a plain chat app? Paste SKILL.md into ChatGPT or Gemini as instructions. You lose auto-triggering, but the method still works.